Top

Rand Fishkin terrible shoes

August 20, 2008 by Dean 

Rand Fishkin the instantly recognisable face

Rand Fishkin the instantly recognisable face

Depending on where you stand, scratch that no matter where you stand you will be able to see Rand`s choice of footwear, from pretty much anywhere on the planet thanks to google earth and the glimmering sheen that blinds us all.  In all seriousnous Rand Fishkin is one of those who have learned his trade through years of exploration and experimentation that makes him stand out (ahem) from the crowd, like myself right now, he was a serial lurker of the SEO forums and has broken into the SEM world by laying solid bricks with SEOmoz.org

The latest posts from (SEOmoz.org)

Do Sitemaps Affect Crawlers? - Tue, 06 Jan 2009

Posted by chenry

Like any other person out there, I fall into habits, good and bad.  Recently while working on a client’s website, I created a Sitemap and submitted it to the search engines, like I always do.  I started to think if this really helps the site out and what’s the effect when I submit a Sitemap on the site.

I approached one of my clients who has a semi popular blog and uses WordPress and the Google XML Sitemaps Generator plugin for WordPress.  I asked for permission to install my tracking script on their site to track the whereabouts of the bots.  For those of you who don’t know what the Google XML Sitemaps Generator is, every time you edit or create a post on WordPress it creates a new sitemap and submits it to the major search engines.

My client is good at posting new content to their blog, usually around 2 or 3 posts a week.  The script that I installed on their website was written in PHP and tracked every time a bot accessed the Sitemap, every time the Sitemap was submitted, and every page it crawled on the website.  The script stored this information in a MySQL database along with a timestamp, IP address, and the user agent.  I also modified the Sitemap generator to insert a timestamp every time the sitemap was submitted to the search engines.

Onto the data!

The experiment was to see if submitting a Sitemap to Google and Yahoo would decrease the time it took Google to crawl and index the page.  The results for this blog were amazing!  When a Sitemap was submitted the average time it took for the bot to visit the new post was 14 minutes for Google and 245 minutes for Yahoo.   When no Sitemap was submitted and the bot had to crawl to the post, it took 1375 minutes for Google and 1773 for Yahoo.   The averages were calculated on 12 different posts, 6 with Sitemaps being submitted, and 6 with the Sitemaps not being submitted.

Crawl Time - No Sitemap

Crawl Time - Sitemap Submitted

After calculating the data, I thought there had to be a mistake.  I went to my site (GR Web Designs, shameless plug) and quickly created a new post and submitted a Sitemap to Google and Yahoo.  I checked my tracking script 30 minutes later and Google had already been there and the new post was indexed. Yahoo followed shortly after Google did also. 

After seeing how long it took the bot to crawl without a Sitemap, I figured there was a problem with the structure of the website and the bots couldn’t crawl to the new pages.  When I looked at the site and had others look into the crawlability, we found no problems.  I also looked and found that the bot assessed the page where the new links pointed to the new posts but never went on to crawl the page until later. 

I was doing research for this post and found Rand’s post titled “My Advice on Google Sitemaps - Verify, but Don't Submit," and I found myself perplexed.  Why would Rand tell me not to submit my Sitemap when I received such great results from it?  After rereading the post, I found that he was more interested in getting the valuable crawl data.  Granted that I’m using WordPress and know that all my pages are crawlable, why wouldn’t I submit the Sitemap, especially if I’m going to get results like above?

For sites like the one in the experiment, that know their site has no issues with the natural crawl, I would suggest that they submit a Sitemap because it will lead to a faster crawl and inclusion in the indexes.  If you have a site where you are unsure if your link structure is correct, I would suggest that you do NOT submit a Sitemap.  This will help you determine whether or not you have problems.  For all those people out there who have websites that have great link structure, why not help get things going faster and submit a Sitemap to Google and Yahoo today.

I would love to hear what the SEOmoz community has to say about their use of Sitemaps.  Remember, this experiment was only completed on one site and I might do further study on the use of Sitemaps if I get a good response from all of you.


Do you like this post? Yes No

If I Could Change One Thing About the SEO Industry, It Would Be... - Mon, 05 Jan 2009

Posted by randfish

My personal ending would be - to Improve the Industry's Professionalism. We're a young industry, which means opportunity, excitement and lots of fantastic entrepreneurs and personalities. Conversely, it also means a lot of unprofessional, immature behavior, even from those of us who should know better (and yes, I'm certainly including my own actions from time to time in that group). I wish we could:

  • Argue and debate, both online and in-person, in more constructive ways
  • Do more to reward those who contribute consitently positive, valuable material
  • Do less to reward those who contribute personal attacks, overly sensitive egos & negativity
  • Refrain from cliques and gossip 
  • As a group, apply more principles of the Scientific Method to our practices
  • Think more holistically and long-term about SEO

To be honest, I think we've actually been moving in the right direction for the last few years (despite the occassional relapse). There's a long way to go, but I'm optimistic that 2009 can be our best year yet. Perhaps the world's economic turmoil will remind us to focus on what really matters.

Your turn. Go ahead and finish this sentence (or paragraph) in the comments:

If I Could Change One Thing About the SEO Industry, It Would Be...

I'm excited to hear what others want.


Do you like this post? Yes No

Best Practices for Content Optimization - Sun, 04 Jan 2009

Posted by randfish

Is it possible that in all the years we've been writing at SEOmoz, there's never been a solid walkthrough on the basics of content optimization? Let's fix that up.

First off, by content, I don't mean keyword usage or keyword optimization. I'm talking about how the presentation and architecture of the text, image and multimedia content on a page can be optimized for search engines. The peculiar part is that many of these recommendations are second-order effects. Having the right formatting or display won't necessarily boost your rankings directly, but through it, you're more likely to earn links, get clicks and eventually benefit in search rankings. If you regularly practice the techniques below, you'll not only earn better consideration from the engines, but from the human activities on the web that influence their algorithms.

Content Structure

Because SEO has become such a holistic part of website improvement, it's no surprise that content formatting - the presentation, style and layout choices you select for your content - are a part of the process. Choosing sans serif fonts like Arial and Helvetica are wise choices for the web; Verdana in particular has received high praise from usability/readability experts, such as this article from WebAIM:

Verdana is one of the most popular of the fonts designed for on-screen viewing. It has a simple, straightforward design, and the characters or glyphs are not easily confused. For example, the upper-case "I" and the lower-case "L" have unique shapes, unlike Arial, in which the two glyphs may be easily confused.

Another advantage of Verdana is that the spacing between letters. One consideration to take into account with Verdana is that it is a relatively large font. The words take up more space than words in Arial, even at the same point size.

The larger size improves readability, but also has the potential of disrupting carefully-planned page layouts.

Font choice is accompanied in importance by sizing & contrast issues. Type smaller than 10pt is typically very challenging to parse and in all cases, relative font sizes are recommended so users can employ browser options to increase/decrease if necessary. Contrast - the color difference between the background and text is also critical - legibility usually drops for anything that isn't black (or very dark) on a white background.

Content length is another critical piece of the optimization puzzle that's mistakenly placed in the "keyword density" or "unique content" buckets of SEO. In fact, content length can have a big role to play in whether your material is easy to consume and easy to share. Lengthy pieces often don't fare particularly well on the web, while short form and easily-digestible content often has more success. Sadly, splitting long pieces into multiple segments frequently backfires, as abandonment increases while link-attraction falls - the only benefit is page views per visit (which is why so many CPM-monetized sites employ this tactic).

Last but not least in content structure optimization is the display of the material. Beautiful, simplistic, easy-to-use and consumable layouts garner far more readership and links than poorly designed content wedged between ad blocks that threaten to overtake the page. I'd recommend checking out The Golden Ratio in Web Design from NetTuts, which has some great illustrations and advice on laying out web content on the page.

CSS & Semantic Markup

CSS is commonly mentioned as a "best practice" for general web design & development, but its principles coincide with many SEO guidelines as well. First, of course, is web page size. Google used to recommend keeping pages under 101K and, although most suspect that's no longer an issue, keeping file size low means faster load times, lower abandonment rates and a higher probability of being fully indexed, fully read and more frequently linked-to.

CSS can also help with another hotly debated issue: code to text ratio. Some SEOs swear that making code to text ratio smaller (so there's less code and more text) can help considerably on large websites with many thousands of pages. My personal experience showed this to be true (or, at least, appeared to be true) only once, but since good CSS makes it easy, there's no reason not to make it part of your standard operating procedure for webdev. Use tableless CSS stored in external files & keep Javascript calls external and follow in the path of CSS Zen

Finally, CSS provides an easy means for "semantic" markup. For a primer, see Digital Web Magazine's article, Writing Semantic Markup. For SEO purposes, there are only a few primary tags that apply and the extent of microformats interpretation (using tags like or

) is less critical (the engines tend to sort out semantics largely on their own since so few web publishers participate in this coding fashion). Using CSS code to provide emphasis, to quote/reference and to reduce the use of tables and other bloated HTML mechanisms for formatting, however, can make a positive difference.

Content Uniqueness & Depth

The final portion of our content optimization discussion is the most important. Few can debate the value the engines place on robust, unique, value-adding content. Google in particular has had several rounds of kicking "low quality content" sites out of their indices, and the other engines have followed suit.

The first critical designation to avoid is "Thin Content" - an insider phrase that (loosely) means that which the engines do not feel contributes enough unique material to display a page competitively in the search results. The criteria have never been officially listed, but I have seen & heard many examples/discussions from engineers and would place the following on my list:

  • 30-50 unique words, forming unique, parseable sentences that other sites/pages do not have
  • Unique HTML text content, different from other pages on the site in more than just the replacement of key verbs & nouns (yes, this means all those sites that build the same page and just change the city and state names thinking it's "unique")
  • Unique titles and meta description elements - if you can't write unique meta descriptions, just exclude them. I've seen similarity algos trip up pages and boot them from the index simply for having near-duplicate meta tags.
  • Unique video/audio/image content - the engines have started getting smarter about identifying and indexing pages for vertical search that wouldn't normally meet the "uniqueness" criteria

BTW - You can often bypass these limitations if you have a good quantity of high value, external links pointing to the page in question (though this is very rarely scalable) or an extremely powerful, authoritative site (note how many one sentence Wikipedia stub pages still rank).

The next criteria from the engines demands that websites "add value" to the content they publish, particularly if it comes from (wholly or partially) a secondary source. This most frequently applies to affiliate sites, whose re-publishing of product descriptions, images, etc. has come under search engine fire numerous times. In fact, we've recently dealt with this issue on several sites and concluded it's best to anticipate manual evaluations here even if you've dodged the algorithmic sweep. The basic tenants are:

  • Don't simply re-publish something that's found elsewhere on the web unless your site adds substantive value to users
  • If you're hosting affiliate content, expect to be judged more harshly than others, as affiliates in the SERPs are one of users' top complaints about search engines
  • Small things like a few comments, a clever sorting algorithm or automated tags, filtering, a line or two of text, or advertising does NOT constitute "substantive value"

For some exemplary cases where websites fulfill these guidelines, check out the way sites like C|Net (example), UrbanSpoon (example) or Metacritic (example) take content/products/reviews from elsewhere, both aggregating AND "adding value" for their users.

Last, but not least, we have the odd (and somewhat unknown) content guideline from Google, in particular, to refrain from "search results in the search results" (see this post from Google's WebSpam Chief, including the comments, for more detail). Google's stated feeling is that search results generally don't "add value" for users, though others have made the argument that this is merely an anti-competitive move. Whatever the motivation, here at SEOmoz, we've cleaned up many sites' "search results," transforming them into "more valuable" listings and category/sub-category landing pages, and have had great success recovering rankings and gaining traffic from Google.

In essence, you want to avoid the potential for being perceived (not necessarily just by an engine's algorithm but by human engineers and quality raters) as search results. Refrain from:

  • Pages labeled in the title or headline as "search results" or "results"
  • Pages that appear to offer a query-based list of links to "relevant" pages on the site without other content (add a short paragraph of text, an image, and a formatting that makes the "results" look like detailed descriptions/links instead)
  • Pages whose URLs appear to carry search queries, e.g. ?q=seattle+restaurants vs. /seattle-restaurants

Though it seems strange, these subtle, largely cosmetic changes can mean the difference between inclusion and removal. Err on the side of caution and dodge the appearance of search results.


Please do share your own lessons and suggestions for optimizing content. I don't doubt there's even more material here for those dedicated to the practice. 

 

BTW - If you're looking for more "keyword targeting" focused advice, check out our best practices for keyword usage & targeting from the Beginner's Guide re-write.


Do you like this post? Yes No

Redirect 301 /jane.html - Fri, 02 Jan 2009

Posted by Jane Copland

It was a bit difficult hitting the Compose Entry link in my account to write this, because this will be one of the last blog posts I write as an SEOmoz staff member. At the end of this month and after two and half fantastic years, I'm leaving SEOmoz and Seattle. It's amazingly hard to know how to write something like this: I want to get across so much and there's no way to word it at all cleverly. Like how this is one of the toughest things I've ever had to do because I just love it here, but that I'm also excited about where I'm going next. And how I struggle a lot with the fact that my life wouldn't even resemble what it is now if I hadn't replied to a Craigslist ad for an entry-level "SEO" (whatever the hell that was) at 2am a couple of months after I graduated from college. God knows what normally happens to twenty-two year olds with English degrees, but I know that they don't usually end up with one of the greatest jobs around. I owe SEOmoz so much. This couldn't get much more difficult if it tried.

However, as do a lot people, I've reached a point for entirely personal reasons where I have to move on to the next chapter of my life (and a quite exciting chapter it is). I am moving to London to join Ayima Search Marketing, home of Sphinn editor and great friend of mine, Rob Kerry. Even though the answer to "what is my first task going to be?" was "learn to use a Mac," I can't wait to get stuck into work over there. I'm joining their team as a search marketer and I'll be working with their clients and projects... apparently only on Apple computers!

As trite as it sounds, I still do look around every so often and marvel at how lucky I am. Firstly, I am constantly astonished that Rand didn't read my atrocious candidacy blog post and pass me up for a less-idiotic competitor. I love it that I was sent to my first search conference--Pubcon in 2006--six weeks after joining the company: talk about being thrown into the deep end! This job has taken me to Australia, New York, Las Vegas and London... and SEO will take me back there again, only this time with a one-way ticket.

Just to be sentimental, I want to take a short trip down memory lane and document my favourite memories from my time here (and believe me, I'll miss lots because there have been many fantastic moments!):
  • I had been drinking when Rand called me to tell me that I was one of the final six candidates for this job, and I was asleep when Rand called me to tell me I had got the job.
  • One week after Scott was hired, he and I found ourselves browsing Funny2.com late on a Friday afternoon. On the aptly-named /huh.htm, we discovered a couple of ridiculous one-liners that resulted in both of us being completely incapacitated by laughter. The culprits were: "I wasn't rich like you guys. I didn't eat gold or have a flying pony", "Cross my legs and hope to die!" and "He won't last, he's just a flash in the pants." We did, however, hear Rand say to someone, "well at least it seems like they're getting on okay..."
  • When we hired Mel, we knew he was from Texas. We were a bit fascinated by the idea that we'd hired someone from the South, but were sad to discover that he didn't have a particularly strong accent. However, the first time he said "y'all" in the office, we all did a bit of a double-take and stared at him, impressed, for a couple of seconds too long.
  • After the inaugural SMX Advanced in Seattle in 2007, Lisa Ditlefsen visited our office. We were all very hungover (some of us more than others. Ahem.) from the SEOmoz party the night before. Sitting around eating sushi in our old office's kitchen, Lisa took a look into one of our little rooms, which served as Whiteboard Studios. We used to own an awful Yahoo!-purple velvet sofa and it was stored in the little room along with Scott's video equipment and studio lights. Lisa came out of the room looking horrified. "Erm," she said, "what happens in there?" I think she still has a sneaking suspicion that we were doing some adult work on the side.
  • Bringing a large version of this picture up on Yahoo!'s large monitor in the exhibit hall floor at Pubcon in 2007 by accident, right after being scolded for checking Gmail on a Yahoo! computer. That's Mel, of "y'all" fame.
  • You Q&A folks have provided some great one-liners throughout my time here. I've already documented some of them here, but since the publication of that post, there have been more. My recent favourite began, "I always seem to get to ask dumb questions (no comments please) and here is another one." However, my all-time favourite is definitely the question that ended with, "Excuse me I am French."
  • Even though I have worked here since September 18, 2006, my father still cannot pronounce SEOmoz. The best we get out of him is, "SEOahhh... SEOahhh..." So, of course, I have joined another company with a name that he cannot say. Explaining that it's just "Eye Ee Ma" hasn't helped.
  • SMX Sydney:



  • Partnering with Distilled:

I have loved my time at SEOmoz more than anyone could hope to love any job, let alone their first. Becoming a Mozzer was the best thing ever to happen to me, right from my first telephone interview to now. Rand, thank you so much for hiring me and keeping me around, and thanks to all of you for being part of the SEOmoz community during my time here. As well as at Ayima, you'll continue to find me on the SEO Chicks blog and, in the near future, at the back of LondonSEO events, Guinness in hand. See you there :)


Just one flight away :)


A great group of co-workers: I'll miss you all.

Do you like this post? Yes No

10 Irrational Human Behaviors and How to Leverage Them to Improve Web Marketing - Tue, 30 Dec 2008

Posted by randfish

I couldn't help but love Chris Yeh's Outline of Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape Our Decisions. It's a fascinating look into the surprisingly predictable psychology that powers human actions and reactions, and I think there are some definitive lessons we can take away from the piece and apply to web marketing. Let's run through the list:

I: The Truth About Relativity

When Williams-Sonoma introduced bread machines, sales were slow. When they added a "deluxe" version that was 50% more expensive, they started flying off the shelves; the first bread machine now appeared to be a bargain

When contemplating the purchase of a $25 pen, the majority of subjects would drive to another store 15 minutes away to save $7. When contemplating the purchase of a $455 suit, the majority of subjects would not drive to another store 15 minutes away to save $7. The amount saved and time involved are the same, but people make very different choices. Watch out for relative thinking; it comes naturally to all of us.

Lessons to Apply to Web Marketing:

  • Offer a premium version of your product/service and make it easy to compare
  • Charging more has the added benefit of reducing the "bargain shopper" mentality

II: The Fallacy of Supply & Demand

Savador Assael, the Pearl King, single-handedly created the market for black pearls, which were unknown in the industry before 1973. His first attempt to market the pearls was an utter failure; he didn't sell a single pearl. So he went to his friend, Harry Winston, and had Winston put them in the window of his 5th Avenue store with an outrageous price tag attached. Then he ran full page ads in glossy magazines with black pearls next to diamonds, rubies, and emeralds. Soon, black pearls were considered precious.

Simonsohn and Loewenstein found that people who move to a new city remain anchored to the prices they paid in their previous city. People who move from Lubbock to Pittsburgh squeeze their families into smaller houses to pay the same amount. People who move from LA to Pittsburgh don't save money, they just move into mansions.

Lessons to Apply to Web Marketing:

  • Want to be a premium product and charge a premium price? Set yourself against "premium" competitors in premium markets. Positioning is critical to the perception of value.
  • Anchoring happens - plan for it in your sales models and be prepared that old customers will be resistant to new pricing, even when the circumstances are very different.

III: The Cost of Zero Cost

In the real world, this effect was demonstrated by Amazon's free shipping. After Super Saver shipping was introduced, Amazon saw sales increases everywhere except for France. It turned out that the French division offered 1 franc ($0.20) pricing instead of free pricing. When this was changed to free, France saw the same sales increases as elsewhere. Another real-world example: People will wait in line for absurdly long times to get something for free. Free is one of the most powerful ways to trigger behavior.

Lessons to Apply to Web Marketing:

  • Offer free stuff, but make sure you get ROI from it (traffic/ad views/email addresses/etc)
  • Be prepared for the fact that people will ENJOY free stuff more than normal, simply because it is free. Use this to your advantage and give away to those whose love & affection you need (reporters, bloggers, pundits, haters, etc.)
  • Making people work to get something for free is a great way to trigger behaviors that might otherwise cost a fortune (think web surveys, information classification, data entry, etc.)

IV: The Cost of Social Norms

Vohs, Mead, and Goode: Participants were asked to unscramble sentences that were either neutral ("It's cold outside") or related to money ("High-paying salary").  Then they were asked to solve a puzzle.  The experimenter left the room, and the subjects were allowed to go to him for help.

  • "Salary" participants waited 5.5 minutes to ask for help; "neutral" participants waited only 3 minutes
    • Thinking about money made people more self-reliant and less willing to ask for help.
    • On the other hand, they were less willing to help others.
  • The conclusion is that thinking about money puts one in a market frame of mind.  Subjects were:
    • More selfish and self-reliant
    • Wanted to spend more time alone
    • Were more likely to select individual tasks rather than those that required teamwork
    • Chose to sit farther away from others

A real-life example: The AARP asked lawyers to participate in a program where they would offer their services to needy employees for a discounted price of $30/hour. No dice. When the program manager instead asked if they'd offer their services for free, the lawyers overwhelmingly said they would participate.

Conclusion: Market norms drive out social norms.

 Lessons to Apply to Web Marketing:

  • Those who freely contribute to your site/business with recommendations, referrals, content (think blog comments or UGC articles), etc. might not be willing to do so if paid. Think twice before paying for what you might be able to get for free.
  • The mindset of volunteers vs. employees is very different - consider which behavior set you want before deciding on the type of labor to attract.

V: The Influence of Arousal

Ariely and Loewenstein conducted an experiment on Berkeley undergrads (Ariely tried to do this at MIT, but couldn't get the necessary permissions).  They asked them a series of questions.  Then they had the undergraduates stimulate themselves to a state of sexual arousal, and asked them to answer the same set of questions. The results show that people simply don't realize how different their decision-making is during a state of arousal.

Implications - Someone may promise to just say no, but that promise is less likely to hold up during a state of arousal.

Lessons to Apply to Web Marketing

  • There's a reason why AdultFriendFinder made an IPO last week, despite terrible economic conditions
  • Arouse your audience and their behavior changes drastically (note: this is probably not universally applicable)

VI: The Problem of Procrastination and Self Control

Ariely conducted an experiment on his class.  Students were required to write three papers.  Ariely asked the first group to commit to dates by which they would turn in each paper.  Late papers would be penalized 1% per day.  There was no penalty for turning papers in early.  The logical response is to commit to turning all three papers in on the last day of class. The second group was given no deadlines; all three papers were due in the last day of class. The third group was directed to turn their papers in on the 4th, 8th, and 12th weeks.

The results? Group 3 (imposed deadlines) got the best grades. Group 2 (no deadlines) got the worst grades, and Group 1 (self-selected deadlines) finished in the middle. Allowing students to pre-commit to deadlines improved performance. Students who spaced out their commitments did well; students who did the logical thing and gave no commitments did badly.

"These results suggest that although almost everyone has problems with procrastination, those who recognize and admit their weakness are in a better position to utilize available tools for precommitment and by doing so, help themselves overcome it."

Lessons to Apply to Web Marketing:

  • Procrastination is an extremely common human behavior - plan for it in your business and take advantage of it where it can help (trial offers that turn into paid services, for example).
  • By setting up early controls and making people recognize this weakness, we can reduce its negative impact. You can apply this to contractors, employees, vendors, etc.

VII: The High Price of Ownership

The "endowment effect" means that when we own something, we begin to value it more than other people do.

Ariely and Carmon conducted an experiment on Duke students, who sleep out for weeks to get basketball tickets; even those who sleep out are still subjected to a lottery at the end.  Some students get tickets, some don't. The students who didn't get tickets told Ariely that they'd be willing to pay up to $170 for tickets. The students who did get the tickets told Ariely that they wouldn't accept less than $2,400 for their tickets.

There are three fundamental quirks of human nature. We fall in love with what we already have. We focus on what we might lose, rather than what we might gain. We assume that other people will see the transaction from the same perspective as we do.

Lessons to Apply to Web Marketing:

  • In contrast to the recommendations for offering something for free, be aware that users who get your product/service for "free" will place less value on it than those who've worked for it or bought it themselves.
  • It's easier to get more money from your existing customers than it is to attract new ones (this marketing wisdom has been around forever, but applies particularly well given this psychology).

VIII: Keeping Doors Open

In 210 BC, Xiang Yu led an army against the Ch'in Dynasty.  While his troops slept, he burned his ships and smashed all the cooking pots.  He explained to his troops that they had to either fight their way to victory or die.  His troops won 9 consecutive battles.  Eliminating options improved the focus of his troops.

We feel compelled to preserve options, even at great expense, even when it doesn't make sense.

Lessons to Apply to Web Marketing:

  • Narrow your customers' choices and they'll be more likely to commit.
  • Narrow navigation options to the most important/desired behaviors - it may seem counter-intuitive, but if you want users to click, reducing pathways may actually increase interaction (page views, sales, etc).

IX: The Effect of Expectations

Ariely, Lee, and Frederick conducted yet another experiment on MIT students. They let students taste two different beers, and then choose to get a free pint of one of the brews.  Brew A was Budweiser.  Brew B was Budweiser, plus 2 drops of balsamic vinegar per ounce.

When students were not told about the nature of the beers, they overwhelmingly chose the balsamic beer. When students were told about the true nature of the beers, they overwhelmingly chose the Budweiser. If you tell people up front that something might be distasteful, the odds are good they'll end up agreeing with you--because of their expectations.

Not only do we react differently based on stereotypes of others, we react differently based on stereotypes about ourselves. Shin, Pittinsky, and Ambady conducted an experiment on Asian-American women.  A first group was asked questions related to their gender, then given a math test. A second group was asked questions related to their race, then given a math test.

The second group did better on the math test than the first. "Blind" presentation of the facts (presenting the facts, but not revealing which party took which actions) might help people better recognize the truth.

Lessons to Apply to Web Marketing:

  • Take advantage of expectations - if you're selling a product or service and can enhance the perception of value/enjoyment, your market is likely to follow along and actually get more value/enjoyment.
  • Branding is a powerfully ally in value creation - position your brand so that users expect great things, and they'll get them.

X: The Power of Price

Ariely, Waber, Shiv, and Carmon made up a fake painkiller, Veladone-Rx. An attractive woman in a business suit (with a faint Russian accent) told subjects that 92% of patients receiving VR reported significant pain relief in 10 minutes, with relief lasting up to 8 hours.

When told that the drug cost $2.50 per dose, nearly all of the subjects reported pain relief. When told that the drug cost $0.10 per dose, only half of the subjects reported pain relief. The more pain a person experienced, the more pronounced the effect. A similar study at U Iowa showed that students who paid list price for cold medications reported better medical outcomes than those who bought discount (but clinically identical) drugs.

Lessons to Apply to Web Marketing:

  • Higher pricing means higher expectations, but also more fulfillment, even if the product isn't actually more fulfilling! Raise your consulting prices, people.
  • The Placebo effect is strong - don't abuse it, but leverage this knowledge to be smart about your own purchases and investments and as a potentially valuable tool to use in comparisons with competitive products/services/companies.

Your turn - go read the full piece and see if there are any terrific snippets of advice/knowledge that you'd apply to marketing online. I've only covered the surface level, so I suspect there's a great deal more value to be gleaned.

p.s. Posting will remain light through January 5th, but YOUmoz is more active - and at its highest readership levels yet!


Do you like this post? Yes No

If you can not read the posts above, then here is the easy link to SEOmoz

Comments

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Bottom